Non-Surgical Breast Enlargement
Return to the full category guide.
Claims about non-surgical breast treatments often cite studies, but studies vary widely in quality. This page is part of our guide to non-surgical breast enhancement.
Stronger evidence
- Randomised controlled trials with a comparison group
- Large numbers of participants
- Independent measurement of results
- Long follow-up, at least a year
- Systematic reviews of multiple studies
- Publication in recognised peer-reviewed journals
Weaker evidence
- Case reports and small series
- No control group
- Short follow-up
- Results measured by the person selling the treatment
- Studies funded by the manufacturer without independent review
- Animal or laboratory research presented as proof in people
- Testimonials and before-and-after photos
Questions to ask about a study
- Who was studied, and how many?
- What was measured, and how?
- How long were people followed?
- Were there side effects, and how were they reported?
- Who funded it?
Use from a different body area
A treatment studied for the face or skin does not automatically work or stay safe in the breast. Anatomy, tissue behaviour and the consequences of complications differ.
Where to look
Our research library and references page link to original sources. Read the abstract and the limitations, not only the conclusion. If a clinic cannot point to independent evidence for breast use, that absence is important information.
Key takeaway
Look for independent, controlled, long-term evidence in the breast itself. Absence of it is information too.
Continue reading
Related education
Safety and warning signs
Candidacy, risks and when to seek medical help.
External research and sources
Study findings, limitations and original publications.
Non-surgical breast enhancement
The parent guide to the evidence and safety of each option.
Clinical studies and references
External source material for the topics discussed here.